Scheduling Open
3010 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75234

About Court Sanctions in Texas Probate Cases

When you make a filing with the courts or enter an appearance, you are subjecting yourself to the rules of the court.  Litigation is a serious matter.  It has real-world consequences, like sanctions, which can be very serious.

The courts have a number of laws and rules at their disposal to ensure that the parties do not abuse or misuse the judicial process.  The sanction rules are an example of this.  These rules allow the court wide latitude to make monetary and other awards to parties if one or more of the parties is found to have brought the suit or claim in bad faith or for other improper purposes.  

The case of In the Estate of Lang, No. 07-22-00355-CV (Tex. App.–Amarillo [7th Dist.] 2023) provides an opportunity to consider these rules.

Facts & Procedural History

The case involves a mother who died, the mother’s daughter, and one of the mother’s grandchildren.

When the mother died, the grandchild attempted to probate her will.  The daughter filed a competing application to challenge the will.  The competing application asserted that the will was invalid and the decedent died intestate, the mother lacked testamentary capacity, and the will was due to undue influence.  She also contended that the grandchild was not suitable as an executor.

The court found that the will filed by the grandchild was valid, that the daughter violated the “no contest” clause in the will, and that the daughter had filed a frivolous action.  The court sanctioned the daughter by ordering her to pay $15,000 for attorneys fees.  The sanctions were based on the daughter presenting no evidence to support her claims.

This appeal involves the sanction imposed by the court.

Sanctions in Texas Probate Cases

The courts have broad discretion to sanction parties for various actions or inactions when it comes to court proceedings.  Probate cases are no different than other civil litigation in this regard.

Most sanctions are for making false or frivolous filings.  The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (“TRCP”) address this.  

TRCP 13 addresses filings by attorneys.  It allows the courts to sanction the attorney and/or client who brings a groundless action in bad faith.  It says that all pleadings and motions in court are to be done in good faith and that if done with malicious intent to avoid sanctions.

TRCP Chapter 10 is similar.  TRCP 10.001 provides for sanctions for a pleading or motion that is “presented for any improper purpose, including to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.” It goes on to set out the method for getting sanctions before the court, namely, the motion for sanctions.  It also provides the alleged wrongdoer the right to respond.  

The Purpose of Sanctions, Generally

Sanctions in legal proceedings serve several important purposes, including:

  1. Preserving the Integrity of the Judicial Process: One of the primary purposes of sanctions is to maintain the integrity of the judicial system. They discourage parties from engaging in abusive or improper litigation tactics that could undermine the fairness and effectiveness of the legal process.
  1. Deterrence: Sanctions are a deterrent mechanism. By imposing penalties on parties or attorneys who engage in misconduct, it discourages others from pursuing similar actions. This helps prevent the court system from being burdened with frivolous or bad faith claims.
  1. Ensuring Compliance with Rules and Ethical Standards: Sanctions ensure that all parties involved in legal proceedings, including attorneys, adhere to court rules, ethical standards, and professional conduct codes. They encourage parties to act in good faith and follow established procedures.
  1. Promoting Fairness and Justice: Sanctions help level the playing field by penalizing parties who engage in tactics aimed at gaining an unfair advantage or causing unnecessary delays. This promotes fairness and justice in the legal process by ensuring that all parties have an equal opportunity to present their case.
  1. Encouraging Efficient Case Management: Sanctions can be used to encourage efficient case management. For example, when a party engages in dilatory tactics or fails to comply with court orders, sanctions may be imposed to motivate them to cooperate and adhere to deadlines.
  1. Protecting the Opposing Party: Sanctions can provide a remedy for parties who have been harmed by the misconduct of their opponents. They offer a means for the injured party to recover damages or attorney’s fees incurred due to the misconduct.
  1. Conserving Judicial Resources: By discouraging frivolous or abusive litigation, sanctions help conserve the limited resources of the court system. This allows the courts to allocate their time and resources more effectively to legitimate and meritorious cases.
  1. Maintaining Public Confidence: A fair and just legal system is essential for maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. Sanctions help demonstrate that the courts take their role seriously in upholding ethical and procedural standards, which in turn fosters trust in the legal system.
  1. Preventing Abuse of Legal Process: Sanctions prevent the abuse of the legal process by discouraging parties from using litigation as a means of harassment or intimidation, rather than as a legitimate tool for resolving disputes.

These are just some of the reasons why courts might impose sanctions.  But what about the absence of evidence?  Is that sufficient to impose sanctions?  

Sanctions for Not Presenting Evidence

In this case, the sanctions imposed on the decedent’s daughter stemmed from the court having found that the daughter violated TRCP 10 and TRCP 13, as she presented no evidence to support her claims.  It is rare to see a case where sanctions are imposed for not presenting evidence to support a pleading.  

On review, the appeals court notes that the availability of evidence is viewed from the time the pleadings are filed.  The appeals court noted that the daughter had a copy of the will before it was admitted to probate, among a few other items.  This showed that she knew that there was a will, and that the decedent did not die intestate.  There was no evidence of lack of capacity that was presented.  The appeals court noted that the dearth of evidence was contrary to the daughter’s position.  Based on this, the appeals court concluded that the court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that there was “no evidence” presented.  

Having said that, this was a close call.  Typically just about any evidence is sufficient to make the initial filing.  However, what the court seems to be really saying is that once the discovery process started, the daughter should have realized she did not have a winning case and she should have settled the case or voluntarily dismissed her own case (i.e., filed a non-suit).  But the other side was not without a remedy.  Based on the evidence, it seems that the granddaughter could have filed her own motion for summary judgment based on there being no evidence.  

Proof of Attorneys Fees

The appeals court then considered the evidence supporting the amount of the award of attorneys fees.  The appeals court noted that the evidence consisted of testimony from the attorney, but not invoices, receipts, etc.  It is common for attorneys to present invoices, receipts, etc. attached to an affidavit, which supports the claim for attorneys fees.  Since the granddaughter did not do this, the court reversed the trial court and sent the case back for the trial court to consider evidence of the proper amount of the award.

The Takeaway

This probate case shows the gravity of will contests and probate cases. When individuals engage in litigation, they are bound by the court’s rules and are subject to sanctions if they abuse the judicial process. Sanctions in Texas probate cases, as illustrated by this case, are not uncommon and can have significant financial consequences for parties who bring groundless actions in bad faith or fail to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Our Dallas Probate Attorneys provide a full range of probate services to our clients, including helping with probate litigation. Probate is what we do. Affordable rates, fixed fees, and payment plans are available. We provide step-by-step instructions, guidance, checklists, and more for completing the probate process.We have years of combined experience we can use to support and guide you with probate and estate matters. Call us today for a FREE attorney consultation.

Disclaimer: The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The information presented may not apply to your situation and should not be acted upon without consulting a qualified probate attorney. We encourage you to seek the advice of a competent attorney with any legal questions you may have.

Immediate DownloadFREE Access to Our Texas Probate Guide

Don't miss out, get a copy today!